Though many parents and some experts repeat the idea there’s a “need for balance” between technology, human interaction and more traditional kinds of play and learning, the role of marketing by both media companies who are creating apps and toy-makers who are hoping to profit from the next mega-gift hit make it increasingly difficult for parents to avoid the onslaught of screens.
In perhaps the most egregious example of toy-maker complicity in the problem, Fisher-Price has now come under fire from parents, pediatricians, and child welfare advocates for marketing what they call the “iPad Apptivity Seat.” The product, specifically designed for newborns, is a small, cushioned bucket seat with a built-in extension arm and case that holds an iPad just inches from the baby’s face.
The description on Amazon.com—where it’s listed as one of the “best gifts for kids in 2013”—tells prospective customers: “If you insert and lock your iPad into the mirror’s case, the visual display provides another way to stimulate and engage baby while protecting your device from baby’s sticky fingers.”
After learning about the product, Dr. Linn’s organization, the CCFC, launched a recall campaign demanding that Fisher-Price remove it from store shelves and sent a letter to the company along with more than 12,000 names gathered in their petition drive.
“As a pediatrician, I am horrified by this product and will be advising my patients to avoid it.” –Dr. Mary Kerosky
“In Campaign for a Commercial-Free Childhood’s 13-year history, no petition we’ve hosted has garnered more signatures—or generated more passion,” said Dr. Linn in the letter. “People expect better of Fisher-Price and are shocked that the company is selling a product with such a cynical disregard for infants’ wellbeing.”
Though Fisher-Price claimed that they were not marketing the ‘Apptivity Seat’ as an education toy, the CCFC said this “simply isn’t true”:
Dr. Linn added: “It’s clear Fisher-Price is attempting damage control, but the best way to protect their brand is do the right thing for babies and families and pull the plug on the iPad bouncy seat.”
Many of those who joined the campaign—including parents, doctors, and educators—expressed their personal outrage.
“This is shameful, and a violation of the rights of our youngest children to make their own choices about what to engage with,” declared Karyn Callaghan of Hamilton, Ontario. “What a cynical move!”
“As a pediatrician, I am horrified by this product and will be advising my patients to avoid it,” said Dr. Mary Kerosky of Anchorage, Alaska. “I am a fan of some of the ‘old’ Fisher-Price toys and hoped to buy some for family members. But I will be boycotting Fisher-Price until this toy is recalled.”
And Catherine Broz, a schoolteacher in Seaside, California said: “I am an early childhood educator, currently teaching parent education for parents in a birth to age 3 program. The American Academy of Pediatrics recommends no screen time for babies at all. I am shocked that this product will be marketed to parents. Babies need to be stimulated by human interaction that engages their five senses. This product forces an infant to look at a screen and blocks their view of the real world around them. I strongly urge Fisher-Price to remove this product from the market. Until then, I will use this product as an example of the harmful affects of screen time on infants in my classes.”
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
Click Here: new zealand chiefs rugby jersey